Breaking: Labour government won't implement existing right for workers to request predictable hours

Male hand of planner writing daily appointment On 2020 Calendar book,working space at home.Asian man plan and noted schedule(holiday trip) on the diary at office desk.Calendar for planner concept

The Department for Business and Trade has said that it has ‘no plans’ to introduce the secondary legislation necessary to implement the Worker (Predictable Terms and Conditions) Act 2023.

29.08.2024

The Act gives some workers the right to ask their employer for a more predictable working pattern including the right to work for a certain number of hours, or on particular days of the week. It also applies to workers engaged under fixed term contracts of less than 12 months and provides that employers can only turn down requests if they have a business reason for doing so. 

Although the Act came into force on 18 September 2023, it set out a framework and needed separate regulations to explain exactly how the principles would work. We expected the previous government to do this, but it called the election before that happened. That meant it was down to the new government to decide how to proceed. 

The Labour Party's employment law pledges contained in its Make Work Pay plan included its intention to end ‘one sided flexibility’ between employers and workers. It promised to ensure that ‘all jobs provide a baseline level of security and predictability’ and for workers to ‘have the right to have a contract that reflects the number of hours they regularly work, based on a twelve-week reference period’. 

It could have used the existing Act to easily make some of these changes with a view to strengthening them later on. But it's decided against that approach - it says - because it didn't want to confuse employers and workers by having two different models. The Act will, therefore, be repealed in due course.

The government has said that it intends to implement the Make Work Pay plan in full. The Employment Bill is due to be published soon and we'll need to wait and see if this new right is included. We'll keep you posted. 

Our newsletters

We publish monthly employment newsletters. If you'd like to be added to the mailing list, please let me know. 

Key Contacts

Related Articles

  • Belief discrimination: it's not what you say, it's the way that you say it
    Expert Comment
    Belief discrimination: it's not what you say, it's the way that you say it
    When can an employer dismiss a member of staff who says something that is protected as a belief, but offends other people?
  • Don't ask, don't get: EAT clarifies the right to be accompanied
    Expert Comment
    Don't ask, don't get: EAT clarifies the right to be accompanied
    The EAT has considered whether an employee can bring a claim for breach of the duty to be accompanied where he wasn't told about the purpose of the meeting and didn't ask to bring a companion.
  • Do you include a training repayment clause in your contracts of employment?
    Expert Comment
    Do you include a training repayment clause in your contracts of employment?
    The Court of Appeal has for the first time considered whether training cost clawback provisions in employment contracts are in restraint of trade and therefore unenforceable.

Recognised for excellence. Chosen for care.

  • Legal 500 Top Tier Firm UK 202
  • alt tzt
  • Sunday Times Best Places to Work 2025
  • Kings Award Logo
  • ePrivateClient Top Law Firms 2025